[ Site Overview | Stanley
Milgram Basics | Important
References ]
[ Milgram's Films | Little
Known Facts about Milgram | About
Dr. Thomas Blass ]
[ Memorable Milgram Quotes | Question
of the Month ]
Betcha didn't know
...
Although
Milgram was to become one of the most important psychologists
of this century, he never took a single psychology course as an
undergraduate at Queens College, where he obtained his BA in Political
Science. He changed career goals in his senior year and applied
to the Ph.D. program in Social Psychology at Harvard's Department
of Social Relations. Rejected at first because he did not have
any background in psychology, he was accepted provisionally after
he took six psychology courses at three different New York-area
schools in the summer of 1954.
. . . . .
In the fall of 1962, a year before the appearance of his first
journal article on his obedience research, the American Psychological
Association (APA) put Milgram's membership application "on hold"
because of questions raised about the ethics of that research.
After an investigation by the APA produced a favorable result,
they admitted him.
. . . . .
The first published criticism of his obedience experiments appeared
in an unusual place. In the fall of 1963, right after the first
appearance of his research in a journal, the St. Louis Post-Dispatch
published an editorial criticizing him and Yale for the highly
stressful experience he created for his subjects. Milgram found
out about the editorial from a St. Louis social psychologist,
Robert Buckhout. As a result, Milgram was able to write a rebuttal
that the newspaper subsequently published on its editorial page.
. . . . .
In August, 1976, CBS presented a prime-time dramatization of the
obedience experiments and the events surrounding them, titled
"The Tenth Level." William Shatner had the starring role as Stephen
Hunter, the Milgram-like scientist. Milgram served as a consultant
for the film. While it contains a lot of fictional elements, it
powerfully conveyed enough of the essence of the true story for
its writer, George Bellak, to receive Honorable Mention in the
American Psychological Association's media awards for 1977.
. . . . .
Milgram's "shock machine" still exists. It can be found at the
Archives of the History of American Psychology at the University
of Akron. For a number of years, beginning in 1992, it was part
of a traveling psychology exhibit created by the American Psychological
Association.
. . . . .
Milgram's mentoring style was to be supportive of his students'
interests rather than impose his own research interests on them.
Although he chaired the largest number of Ph.D. theses in the
Psychology Department while at the Graduate Center of CUNY from
1967-84, only one of them was an obedience experiment: A "role-played"
version conducted by Daniel Geller in 1975, using Milgram's machine.
. . . . .
Who are more obedient -men or women? Milgram found an identical
rate of obedience in both groups-65%--although obedient women
consistently reported more stress than men. There are about a
dozen replications of the obedience experiment world-wide which
had male and female subjects. All of them, with one exception,
also found no male-female differences.
. . . . .
Would Milgram find less obedience if he conducted his experiments
today? I doubt it. To go beyond speculation on this question,
I carried out the following statistical analysis. I gathered all
of Milgram's standard obedience experiments and the replications
conducted by other researchers. The experiments spanned a 25-year
period from 1961 to 1985. I did a correlational analysis relating
each study's year of publication and the amount of obedience it
found. I found a zero-correlation-that is, no relationship whatsoever.
In other words, on the average, the later studies found no more
or less obedience than the ones conducted earlier. A more detailed
report of this finding, as well as the finding on sex-differences
described in the previous paragraph, can be found in my article,
"The Milgram paradigm after 35 years: Some things we now know
about obedience to authority," which appears in the Journal
of Applied Social Psychology, 1999, Vol. 25, pp. 955-978.
. . . . .
Rock musician, Peter Gabriel, was a serious and avid admirer of
Milgram. His album, "So," which came out in 1986, contains a track
titled, "We do what we're told-Milgram's 37." What does the "37"
refer to? The answer is posted in the Question of the Month section
of the website.
[ Site Overview | Stanley
Milgram Basics | Important
References ]
[ Milgram's Films | Little
Known Facts about Milgram | About
Dr. Thomas Blass ]
[ Memorable Milgram Quotes | Question
of the Month ]